Fifth Avenue Apple Store Opening on May 19

Gather ’round loyal consumers, there’s a new Apple Store opening in just a few days. That’s right, on May 19, Apple is hosting the grand opening of its flagship retail store on Manhattan’s Fifth Avenue. There’ll be cool prizes, plastered with the familiar Apple logo, of course, since you’re a human billboard now; be one of the first to proudly wear a t-shirt that you got from the store’s opening.

This really is something special since it’s not like Fifth Avenue has many high-end stores or anything. Still, since it’s a rule that we treat Apple with kid gloves all the time, we look forward to the opening of this new brick and mortar outlet. Now let’s all think inside the box. Right. [Thanks, Justin!]

Apple Store – Fifth Avenue [Apple]

Advertisements

Transparent toaster: enemy of burnt bread

Ah, toast… so simple, so versatile, so delicious. But burnt toast? No thanks. If you had one of these transparent toasters, you’d never have to worry about burning your toast again, since you’d be able to see it turning a perfect golden brown evenly on both sides. It works by heating the twin panes of glass… in theory. The glass doesn’t get hot enough to do anything more than make warm bread at the moment, but someday see-through toasting might be a reality. One can dream, at least.
— Adam Frucci

Transparent Toaster Concept, via Gizmodo

 

[originating url]

The Return of Lewis!

 
You guys have to check out this blog post:
 
MK wrote:
"Over a month ago I became fascinated with the hottest cat on Earth: Lewis. Lewis was that crazy bitch who terrorized a Connecticut neighborhood and almost killed an Avon lady. Neighbors were fed up with his ass and wanted him burned alive!

Well, Lewis is going to court! Ruth Cisero is his owner and withdrew her bid for probation, because she would’ve had to have poor Lewis euthanized. Prosecutors would only allow giving Ruth probation if Lewis was murdered!

Lewis has already become a cult classic over the internet. Over 500 "Save Lewis" t-shirts have been sold in order to raise funds for Ruth’s defense. He even has his own MySpace!"

Buy a t-shirt here! I know I am. Lewis is way too hot to leave this world! Stupid bitches gotta support one another!

When you hear ringing and there’s no one there

Six minutes 39 seconds into the Richard Thompson song "Calvary Cross," Mike Pelusi, a music reviewer in Philadelphia, will almost invariably check his cell phone.

Minka Wiltz, an actress in Atlanta, has tried to answer her phone to the thrrrrup, thrrrrup, thrrrrup of a truck bouncing down a pothole-pocked street.

Others say they thought they heard phones ring while taking a shower, using a blow-dryer or watching commercials. What they are hearing is a barely discernable sound–perhaps chimes, a faint trill or an electronic bleat–that they mistake for the ringtone of their cell phone, which isn’t ringing. This audio illusion–called phantom phone rings or, more whimsically, ringxiety or fauxcellarm–has emerged recently as an Internet discussion topic and has become a new reason for people to either bemoan the techno-saturation of modern life or question their sanity.

 

Some sound experts believe that because cell phones have become a fifth limb for many, people now live in a constant state of phone vigilance, and hearing sounds that seem like a telephone’s ring can send an expectant brain into action.

"My experience has been hearing just a few notes that are similar to my phone’s ring, my brain will fill in the rest," said David Laramie, a doctoral student at the Los Angeles campus of the California School of Professional Psychology, who is writing his dissertation about the effect of cell phones on behavior.

He plans to send questionnaires this summer to learn when and how often phantom rings happen and who is most likely to experience them. A few notes in the background of a television commercial can fool him, he said. Other times the culprit will be the sound effects in a song on the radio. "Another place I hear it is running water, so I sometimes hear it while I’m shaving," Laramie said.

Phantom rings are a "psycho-acoustic phenomenon" related to the way the human brain interprets sound, said Rob Nokes, president of Sound Dogs, a sound effects company in California.

The ear gives unequal weights to certain frequencies, making it particularly sensitive to sounds in the range of 1,000 to 6,000 hertz, scientists say. Babies cry in this range, for example, and the familiar "brrring, brrring" ringtone hits this sweet spot, too. (Simple ringtones are more likely to produce phantom rings than popular music used as a ringtone.)

"Your brain is conditioned to respond to a phone ring just as it is to a baby crying," Nokes said.

Ominous and ubiquitous
Why people seem to be hearing phantom rings more often now is another question. The answers range from the paranoid to the vast exposure to cell phones in people’s lives–there were 207 million wireless subscribers nationwide at the end of 2005, a nearly sevenfold increase in just a decade, according to the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association.

On blogs, some cell phone users wonder if an ominous agenda is at work when a phantom ring is triggered by a television or radio broadcast. A writer posting as Koan on forumgarden.com said that at first, songs played on the radio triggered a phantom ring. "Thing is, the high-pitched sounds, although a lot fainter, are still present during announcements now," Koan wrote. "What is this? Is it subliminal advertising … or something else?"

Peter Arnell, the chief creative officer of the Arnell Group in New York and a major force in the marketing business, said that theory might not be far off the mark. While he said he has never been asked by a client to include sounds in an advertisement that would mimic a ringing cell phone, he thinks the increasing use of high-pitched, electronic tones is very much by design.

"People are using a sound trigger to control emotions," Arnell said. "The most controlling device in our life right now is a cell phone."

He suggested that a sound trick that sent confused listeners hunting for their cell phones might be especially effective for ads ending with a call to action. (An example is a directive to "Call this toll-free number now!")

"Hollywood has always known how to use sound to control emotions, right?" Arnell continued. "But this is newer to advertising. Sound effects have become the big deal on Madison Avenue."

Michael Sweet, the creative director of Audio Brain, a sonic branding company in New York that has done work for NBC and Verizon, also said that he had never been asked to use a sound for the purpose of generating a phantom ring. But he also said he believes that the ear-brain trick isn’t a mistake.

"I think it’s definitely intentional," Sweet said. "Do ad agencies know they’re getting your attention? Sure. Do they know it’s because you’re trying to answer your phone to the TV? Not necessarily." Allen Henderson, who runs the blog AwfulCommericals.com, was bothered by a Toyota ad showing a man dragging a rusted heap of a car uphill as if it were a ball and chain. The chain eventually snaps and the man is free to drive a Toyota. Henderson lamented what he called the spot’s overblown premise, but that wasn’t the only thing.

"Most of all," Henderson wrote on his blog, "I hate this commercial for making me check my phone every time it came on the air." Steve R. Chavez, creative director for Saatchi & Saatchi, the Los Angeles agency that created the spot, "Ball and Chain," seemed tickled when told of Henderson’s phantom ring experience.

"You know, it only took us 20 years to develop that," Chavez said impishly. "I’m soooo kidding.

No one meant to put anything that sounded like a cell phone ringtone in the spot.

–Rob Kaplan, director of music production, McGarry Bowen ad agency

"I think, as an industry, we’re often accused of manipulation. It’s simply not true." And after this reporter was taunted by phantom rings from "Homage," a television spot for Marriott Hotels, the ad agency that created it, McGarry Bowen in New York, said any confusion was purely unintentional. "Everyone here is kind of baffled," said Rob Kaplan, the director of music production at McGarry Bowen. "No one meant to put anything that sounded like a cell phone ringtone in the spot."

In "Homage," which was conceived as a tribute to business travelers, a series of twinkling chimes punctuate shots of hotel rooms, a traveler falling back on a bed, and shoes kicked off on the floor.

Kaplan said the spot was created before he was hired but that the sound design wasn’t meant to fool the ear. "I’ve worked on a lot of spots that have used a lot of modern, atonal sounds," Kaplan said. "It is kind of cutting edge and compliments visuals really well."

Intentional or not, audio experts say fooling the ear into hearing a ringing phone isn’t hard.

As long as it’s a more traditional trill, a telephone ring is a simple tone that can be reproduced relatively easy, said Adam Jenkins, a sound effects mixer who has worked on movies like "Crash" and "Apollo 13."

"It’s a 1,000 hertz tone that can be generated by just about anything," Jenkins said. And because most sounds are the result of two or more tones put together–human speech is multitonal, for example–simple tones really stand out.

Tones that are generated around 1,000 hertz have another special characteristic that helps them hoodwink those within range. It is tough to tell where they are coming from.

Dingie from the ringie
Because humans have ears on each side of their head, they are able to localize most sounds. The direction of high-frequency sounds is pinpointed based on their volume level in each ear, and low frequency sounds based on their arrival time in each ear.

But Guy Moore, an assistant professor of physics at McGill University in Montreal, said human ears do not do a good job finding the source of sounds around 1,000 hertz using either method, so that a noise in that range seems just as likely to be coming from the television to the right as a purse sitting to the left.

"That’s also why it’s so hard to tell where an ambulance siren is coming from in traffic," Moore said.

So, primed as busy people are to respond to a ring, the phone usually is the first response to the question, "Where is that coming from?"

#textCarousel
{width:140px;border-color:#630;border-width:2px;border-style:solid;padding:10px;float:right;margin:15px 0 15px 15px;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-position:-150px top;}
#textCarousel li
{font-size:95%;line-height:1em;margin-bottom:10px;}
#textCarousel h4
{margin:0 0 5px 0;font-size:110%;}

Jonathan Wolff, a retired sound designer in Lexington, Ky., who created the theme songs for "Will & Grace" and "Seinfeld," said he has unintentionally created sound mixes that generate phantom phone rings. "But I take it out if I think its going to be annoying," he said.

While phantom rings may generate reactions from curiosity to irritation, at least explanations for the phenomenon exist. More mysterious are phantom phone vibrations, a cell phone side effect that many people said they also have experienced. It seems that having a phone set to vibrate can cause a particularly physical kind of false alarm.

Charles Maniaci, a special education teacher from Atlanta, said he used to feel phantom vibrations almost constantly. Then about a year ago he developed a lump on his thigh underneath the pocket where he kept his cell phone. "Nobody could tell me what it was," he said.

For a while, he moved his phone to a belt clip. But the vibrations eventually stopped, and he moved the phone back to his pocket. "I’ve thought that maybe the nerves got so irritated from the phone vibrating that this tissue grew around them," he said. "That’s what the body does, it grows tissue around things to protect them. But it’s exactly where I used to keep the phone."

Entire contents, Copyright © 2006 The New York Times. All rights reserved.

Copyright ©1995-2006 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.

Standing Tomb Only, by Airbus


Airbus hotly denies its alleged
bright idea of creating coffin-sized "standing tomb only" padded backboards created especially to cram more sardines into their flying tin cans, contradicting a New York Times article by Christopher Elliott that described the strap-on standing seats in an article last week. But Elliott cries foul in his blog, refusing to back down even though his newspaper printed a mild, sorta/kinda retraction. The Times reporter even produced an illustration of the "seats" for all to see. Said he in his blog:

"I didn’t invent standing airline seats, but some believe that I have. Maybe the only way to clear this up is to post a picture of the seat that someone recently sent to me."

Who knows where this little .gif file came from, but who are we going to believe? A New York Times reporter, or an embarrassed French airline maker in cahoots with greedy, money-losing and passenger-hating airlines around the world?

Taking a stand [ellipses, via The Consumerist]

[originating url]